Comments Feed

Identifying a Subsequence in a Sequence, Part 3 Commented on: 13 weeks ago (July 15, 2014)

Thank you Itzik for this excellent walk-through!

Identifying a Subsequence in a Sequence, Part 1 Commented on: 36 weeks ago (February 6, 2014)

See my set-based solution in second part of this article.
1.5 seconds and 14 000 reads.

Identifying a Subsequence in a Sequence, Part 2 Commented on: 36 weeks ago (February 6, 2014)

Hi Itzik.

The problem is just another Relational Division; Ordered Relational Division. My solution finishes in just 1.5 seconds and uses about 14000 reads.

DECLARE @Items INT = (...

What's a good use for a UNIQUE filtered index? Commented on: 2 years ago (November 21, 2011) I use it to enforce data integrity in our data warehouse. Currently there are two business systems feeding the DW with data, and some tables (like Orders.SalesDetail) containts data from both systems...
Use T-SQL to Generate a Sequence Commented on: 3 years ago (August 22, 2011) Itzik, let me know if you got my script by email. //Peter
Solutions to TSQL Challenge – Reoccurring Visits Commented on: 3 years ago (July 14, 2011) Not bad Mr Celko. Not bad at all. It's clever to build a "dual date" cte holding yesterday's and today's dates. Add "sum(today_flg) as NumVisits," to the final output...
TSQL Challenge – Reoccurring Visits Commented on: 3 years ago (July 6, 2011) Here is my stats with 100,000+ row sample data using same date interval as original (8 row(s) affected) Table 'Worktable'. Scan count 0, logical reads 0. Table 'DailyVisits'. Scan...
Solutions to Packing Date and Time Intervals Puzzle Commented on: 3 years ago (March 25, 2011) Where is my #3? ;-)

SQL Server 2012 T-SQL at a Glance – EXECUTE WITH RESULT SETS Commented on: 3 years ago (March 1, 2011) It would be a really nice feature if this could be combined with this request

http://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/470881/allow-more-than-one-resultset-to-be-stored-with-...

Clarifications Regarding TSQL Challenge: Packing Date and Time Intervals Commented on: 3 years ago (February 8, 2011) Wow! A 14 second solution.
Maybe it's time to reveal "Itzik 1"? :-)




Digital Magazine Archives

Browse back issues of SQL Server Pro, from January 2007 through the last issue published in April 2014. Find the back issues here.

 

From the Blogs
business people around a table and laptop
Oct 9, 2014
blog

AlwaysOn Availability Groups and SQL Server Jobs, Part 10: Dynamic Detection Gotcha #3

You can interject a SQL Server Job Step into your Jobs and have this new/injected Job Step do some checking for you. Here's a look at everything that’s involved in such an approach....More
Man holding a piece of paper with the word GOTCHA
Oct 7, 2014
blog

AlwaysOn Availability Groups and SQL Server Jobs, Part 9: Dynamic Detection Gotcha #2 3

Given that a USE statement is parsed before code is actually run, there are a few options that could be used as a around when it comes to detecting whether or not code should be run....More
iceberg
Oct 2, 2014
blog

AlwaysOn Availability Groups and SQL Server Jobs, Part 8: Dynamic Detection Gotcha #1 1

Learn about why the option of dynamically detecting whether or not to run a SQL Server Job at execution time is quite a bit more problematic than you might think....More
SQL Server Pro Forums

Get answers to questions, share tips, and engage with the SQL Server community in our Forums.

Sponsored Introduction Continue on to (or wait seconds) ×