Incremental Index Maintenance with T-SQLCommented on: 2 years ago
(March 20, 2012)
Worked great on a SQL 2005 9.0.4912 but when I try to run it on two 9.0.4035 I get the messages that follow. First the DB names have underscores so was getting an incorrect systax near '('...
Microsoft seems to be bent on marginalizing SQL Server Standard Edition—both in the sense of the artificial constraints placed upon how much memory it can use, and in terms of what seems to be a shift in focus on the role of Standard Edition from Microsoft....More
When DBAs and SysAdmins learn the ins-and-outs of AlwaysOn Availability Groups, they’re then able to address high availability and disaster recovery concerns from a single interface or set of tooling, thus providing better scalability of management....More