Moving to a New FilegroupCommented on: 4 years ago
(April 29, 2010)
it's probably worth mentioning that doing this for, say, a primary clustered key isn't very efficient.
BOL mentions using the MOVE TO clause in the ALTER TABLE ... DROP CONSTRAINT...
Virtualization Shootout: Hyper-V vs. ESX Server 3.5Commented on: 6 years ago
(July 8, 2008)
So the beta MS product is 4% slower according to that (misleading, IMO) chart... probably not enough of a difference to be a factor. The usability is a good point, though. I'm not sure why MS...
SQL Server 2005 Management ToolsCommented on: 8 years ago
(September 20, 2006)
While I still use Enterprise Manager with our SQL2000 servers more often, I've had a decent amount of experience with SQL 2005's Management Studio and can offer a few thoughts on it. I also spend a...
Digital Magazine Archives
Browse back issues of SQL Server Pro, from January 2007 through the last issue published in April 2014. Find the back issues here.
The quest for the Golden Record to achieve a single, accurate and complete version of a customer record is worth the pursuit to attain survivorship. Record matching and consolidation are only the beginning. Melissa Data takes a new approach. Learn how to apply intelligent rules based on reference data to make smarter and better decisions for data cleansing....More
On SQL Servers where Availability Groups (or Mirroring) isn’t in play, I typically recommend keeping a combination of on-box backups along with copying said backups off-box as well. Obviously, keeping databases AND backups on the SAME server is the metaphorical equivalent of putting all of your eggs in one basket – and therefore something you should avoid like the plague....More
One of the biggest strengths of AlwaysOn Availability Groups is that they allow DBAs to address both high availability and disaster recovery concerns from a single set of tooling or interfaces. But, this doesn’t mean that you won’t still need backups....More